<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in Military Nuts | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/posts</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://military.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Why USN Littoral Combat Ship  Freedom looks not so stealth? replied by gaoxingdcf07 @ Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:31:06 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;true true,each nations' need for thier navies...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:31:06 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326579:8296639</guid>
      <author>gaoxingdcf07</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326579</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why USN Littoral Combat Ship  Freedom looks not so stealth? replied by 16/f/lonely @ Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:05:09 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by gaoxingdcf07:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;he got superman's eyes leh&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;all i can see that the USN's deck is quite clean compared to our
own frigates,ours also neat leh..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the USN ship, it is interesting to note that the foxcle
is exposed on the deck. That will affect RCS, definitely. In
contrast our frigates have theirs buried within the hull, making
the forward deck rather clean. As to how much this affects RCS, I
won't know.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if I read correctly, then I do not doubt that our frigate is
superior in many ways, but that's because the LCS design is biased
towards "austere", "cost-saving" designs. These are just my
observations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover it is interesting to note that this ship can act as a
landing ship, mine-sweeper to name a few roles due to its modular
design. Clearly, the LCS is a compromise between the different
requirements, while our frigate......is what it is, albeit a light
one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore, why compare?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:05:09 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326579:8296376</guid>
      <author>16/f/lonely</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326579</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why USN Littoral Combat Ship  Freedom looks not so stealth? replied by fudgester @ Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:01:08 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by Shotgun:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wah, is your eyes some kinda radar?&amp;nbsp; You look only can see
that its not stealthy....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He's Daredevil mah.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's the only thing that explains his radar sense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/KMess-Cartoon/teeth.png"
alt="teeth.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:01:08 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326579:8296362</guid>
      <author>fudgester</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326579</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why USN Littoral Combat Ship  Freedom looks not so stealth? replied by gaoxingdcf07 @ Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:35:47 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;he got superman's eyes leh&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;all i can see that the USN's deck is quite clean compared to our
own frigates,ours also neat leh..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:35:47 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326579:8296308</guid>
      <author>gaoxingdcf07</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326579</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why USN Littoral Combat Ship  Freedom looks not so stealth? replied by Shotgun @ Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:47:31 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Wah, is your eyes some kinda radar?&amp;nbsp; You look only can see
that its not stealthy....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:47:31 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326579:8295796</guid>
      <author>Shotgun</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326579</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why USN Littoral Combat Ship  Freedom looks not so stealth? replied by lionnoisy @ Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:12:38 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;have few questionson on USN latest,and first in class,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Freedom.&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are many features.I agree.But i am troubled by so many&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;,to me,permantly fixed objects on deck .The design of the
ship&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;seem,to this layman again,not to reduce RCS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In short,the design is not to achieve maximum stealth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be there are other technology alreday incorporated&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;in the design.May be they are waiting for future technology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But too many objects seem not a good&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;way to reduce RCS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pl tell me more of the steath technology in this new class.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be the first in class ship is just on trial mode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In combat mode,the deck of the ship may be much&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cleaner---free of objects to reduce RCS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://x.bbs.sina.com.cn/forum/pic/47471c530105pfs7"
height="1280" alt="" width="854" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
http://bbs.news.sina.com.cn/tableforum/App/view.php?bbsid=4&amp;amp;subid=0&amp;amp;fid=93662&amp;amp;tbid=6648&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://x.bbs.sina.com.cn/forum/pic/47471c530105pfsg"
height="1280" alt="" width="854" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.lmlcsteam.com/photo_gallery/sea_trials/index.html&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dark marks seem exhaust outlets.Will they attract heat
seeking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;missiles?But pl bear in mind USN Freedom is only on Builder's
sea&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;trail.They may in the course to iron out problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=
"http://www.lmlcsteam.com/photo_gallery/sea_trials/_Z6R8519b-t.jpg"
height="375" alt="" width="309" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://x.bbs.sina.com.cn/forum/pic/47471c530105dhu7"
height="914" alt="" width="1280" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;why SG frigate can be so clean on deck?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;reference&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.lmlcsteam.com/media.html&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pl read two doc in Downloads for more details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/littoral/#littoral_17457&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=38819&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My last question is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can they do better,with their billion dollars
budgets,technology&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and two defense giants resources?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:12:38 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326579:8295018</guid>
      <author>lionnoisy</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326579</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero certified air tanker in service for RAAF! replied by lionnoisy @ Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:22:43 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Pl note currently there is no AEW for Oz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is due to be delivered in 2009 and reach FOC in 2010,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;few years behind schedule.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_AEW&amp;amp;C&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=
"http://www.raaf.gov.au/aircraft/images/wedgetail/wedgetail-hbr-bridge.jpg"
height="320" alt="" width="480" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.raaf.gov.au/aircraft/wedgetail.htm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;reda JDW 18.06.2008.by Julian Kerr&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:22:43 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326164:8294747</guid>
      <author>lionnoisy</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326164</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR-21 on Popular Mechanics replied by pqr @ Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:10:41 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;there are several more new rifles that uses the new 6mm
bullet...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i think there are 6 and 6.8 mm bullets now&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;another one i saw is can change barrel to fire 5.56 or 7.62 mm
and many other parts too in 2 mins !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:10:41 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:324237:8294421</guid>
      <author>pqr</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/324237</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WHICH TANK WILL RULE THEM ALL ???? replied by tankfanatic @ Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:45:31 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=""&gt;&lt;span style=
"font-size: x-small; font-family: Verdana;"&gt;'Logistics is the ball
and chain of armored warfare.'&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=""&gt;&lt;span class=""&gt;&lt;a href=
"/quotes/quotes/h/heinzguder182562.html" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"font-size: x-small; color: #0011ff; font-family: Verdana;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
Heinz Guderian&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;so the american have bigger balls , thats all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:45:31 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:306072:8294379</guid>
      <author>tankfanatic</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/306072</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Uighurs ...terrorists or freedom fighters? replied by rain-coat @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:56:21 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;where the hell will they get the grenades in the first
place...and i do believe that the spf and saf are ready. ISD will
probably foil their plan before they can even excute it. sg
experienced terrorist attacks before, so why not now?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:56:21 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326474:8294035</guid>
      <author>rain-coat</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326474</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero certified air tanker in service for RAAF! replied by rain-coat @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:52:39 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;baised POV. pointless to engage a discussion with...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:52:39 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326164:8294026</guid>
      <author>rain-coat</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326164</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR-21 on Popular Mechanics replied by 4Justice @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:20:21 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;PWD or PDW?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:20:21 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:324237:8293478</guid>
      <author>4Justice</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/324237</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR-21 on Popular Mechanics replied by gaoxingdcf07 @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:45:07 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;u mean the PWD that uses the 6mm bullets ?????&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i tink is very nice IMO&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;got the length of an MP5 and the works of an M16&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;got collasible(ps,speling no good) stock !!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;make it very handy in CBQ !!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:45:07 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:324237:8292657</guid>
      <author>gaoxingdcf07</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/324237</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Uighurs ...terrorists or freedom fighters? replied by idwar @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:08:16 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With knives and small explosives, the 2 demolished a platoon of
paramilitary police&amp;nbsp; officers in a high risk rebel zone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If heavily armed...the chinese 100% kaput... &lt;a href="326474#"
class="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src=
"../../../images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/ccmathteam.com/biggrin.png?1212956094"
alt="Emoticons" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will Mas Selamat and hois gang copy cat this attack?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is the SAF or &lt;a href="326474#" class="" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src="../../../images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/ccmathteam.com/biggrin.png?1212956094"
alt="Emoticons" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Police ready? Can they jog in peace at Marine
Parade, West Coast etc?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:08:16 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326474:8292546</guid>
      <author>idwar</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326474</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Uighurs ...terrorists or freedom fighters? replied by idwar @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:53:30 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=
"http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080804/tap-oly-2008-china-xinjiang-attacks-8d4ea94.html"
rel=
"nofollow"&gt;http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080804/tap-oly-2008-china-xinjiang-attacks-8d4ea94.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;&lt;cite class=""&gt;AFP - &lt;span&gt;Tuesday, August
5&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;KASHGAR, China (AFP) - - Chinese authorities moved
Tuesday to keep a lid on further information about a bloody assault
on police in Kashgar with a truck, explosives and machetes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the hotel directly across from the site of Monday's raid,
which killed 16 policemen, guests were told in the morning that the
Internet had been shut off across the city, on police orders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Foreign witnesses described a "sickening" scene that unfolded as
two assailants drove a truck at a group of policemen who were out
jogging, then attacked the officers with small explosives and
machetes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"My wife almost threw up and had to lie down afterward," said
Wlodzislaw Duch, a Polish tourist who watched the assault from his
hotel room directly across the street from the scene.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Xinhua news agency said the two, aged 28 and 33, were
arrested immediately, and identified the men as members of the
Muslim ethnic Uighur group, a Turkic-speaking people that have long
chafed at Chinese rule of Xinjiang.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;========================&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;2 terrorists killed 16 Chinese policemen........&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should Uighurs be given independence or should they be forced to
remain part of China ? &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; They are not Han
Chinese........&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:53:30 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326474:8292515</guid>
      <author>idwar</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326474</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Airsoft Thread replied by 4Justice @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:06:57 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Can't wait for my new Vz61 and M3 shotty ^^&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:06:57 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:325565:8292441</guid>
      <author>4Justice</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/325565</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR-21 on Popular Mechanics replied by pqr @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:10:39 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;so many better rifles, sniper's ones too are shown in discovery
channel "future weapons"..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;very impressive !!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eg, now got 6.8mm rounds instead of 5.56 (M16) and 7.62
(AK47)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:10:39 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:324237:8292123</guid>
      <author>pqr</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/324237</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR-21 on Popular Mechanics replied by 4Justice @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:18:36 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thats cuz they're evaluating it atm. Besides, thats how it is.
You always sell the nicer goods to others because u earn more,
while u keep the most basic crap for yrself because nobody's paying
u more than the bare minimum to equip your own people.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:18:36 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:324237:8291964</guid>
      <author>4Justice</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/324237</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>which weapon would you carry? replied by Ponders @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:12:03 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by Shotgun:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I've a "friend" from an arabic -religious "charitable"
organization that has taken great interests in your desires.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;img src="/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/redones/biggrin.png" alt=
"biggrin.png" /&gt;&lt;img src=
"/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/redones/biggrin.png" alt=
"biggrin.png" /&gt;&lt;img src=
"/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/redones/biggrin.png" alt=
"biggrin.png" /&gt;&lt;img src=
"/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/redones/biggrin.png" alt=
"biggrin.png" /&gt;&lt;img src=
"/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/redones/biggrin.png" alt=
"biggrin.png" /&gt;&lt;img src=
"/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/redones/biggrin.png" alt=
"biggrin.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nah, I am just an old person, you can't expect someone with
walking stick to do Fire &amp;amp; movement to the enemy...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am old, so i guess i make my worth charging into enemy
camp.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:12:03 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:320093:8291815</guid>
      <author>Ponders</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/320093</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S'pore wants to buy 100 of world's most advanced fighters replied by wonderamazement @ Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:01:09 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;not again... &lt;img src="/images/emoticons/classic/icon_lol.gif"
alt="icon_lol.gif" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:01:09 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:323612:8291650</guid>
      <author>wonderamazement</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/323612</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Airship replied by Shotgun @ Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:33:43 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by arball:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hmm...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;big ballon fuel station would be a huge target.... (large...
slow... target....)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;abit bad to have the thing crashing down... huge fireball
falling on you.....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Haha, I think you misunderstand the concept of either mid-air
refueling or airships.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For aircraft to tank in mid air, both the tanker and the
aircraft needs to be level and moving at about 300kts.&amp;nbsp; So its
as large and slow as a regular KC-135, and the KC-135 is
MANNED.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:33:43 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:326261:8291599</guid>
      <author>Shotgun</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/326261</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New SAF Digital Camo No.4 replied by gaoxingdcf07 @ Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:48:40 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;too much text&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;see liao,headache !!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:48:40 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:318534:8291498</guid>
      <author>gaoxingdcf07</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/318534</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New SAF Digital Camo No.4 replied by the Bear @ Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:32:48 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;you guys should go see the shit kicked up in the SAF forum by an
"ArmyWife" &lt;img src=
"/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/KMess-Cartoon/teeth.png" alt=
"teeth.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:32:48 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:318534:8291449</guid>
      <author>the Bear</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/318534</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR-21 on Popular Mechanics replied by gaoxingdcf07 @ Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:29:32 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;even the Peru ppl are having better variant of SAR21 than our
boys...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:29:32 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:324237:8291434</guid>
      <author>gaoxingdcf07</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/324237</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New SAF Digital Camo No.4 replied by gaoxingdcf07 @ Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:28:13 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;tsk tsk !!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;slow and copy things we have seen for the past 3 or 4 pages
!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:28:13 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">military.sgforums.com:1164:318534:8291430</guid>
      <author>gaoxingdcf07</author>
      <link>http://military.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/318534</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
